• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

CHEM Trust

Protecting humans and wildlife from harmful chemicals

  • Home
    • Our policy site
    • Advice for consumers
  • About us
    • About CHEM Trust
    • CHEM Trust Europe
    • Our team
    • UK Trustees
    • Our funders
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Privacy Policy
  • Our work
    • Publications
    • Talks & comment
    • EU policy submissions
    • UK policy submissions
    • Participation in policy processes
    • Our work in the UK
    • Collaboration
    • Newsletters
  • Problem chemicals
    • Hormone Disrupting Chemicals FAQ
    • Bisphenols
    • Phthalates
    • PFAS
    • Pharmaceutical pollution
    • Chemicals and plastics
  • Chemical impacts
    • Neurological Impairment
    • Obesity and Diabetes
    • Breast Cancer
    • Male Reproductive Health
    • Pesticides and cancer
    • Immune system effects
    • Wildlife impacts
  • Chemicals policy
    • EU-REACH
    • Chemicals and the Circular Economy
    • Food contact materials
    • Brexit & Chemicals
    • Global-POPs
    • Chemical mixtures
  • Take Action

Are there safer alternatives to Bisphenol A in thermal paper?

December 11, 2014 By Michael Warhurst

The French government has proposed that there should be a ban on the use of hormone disrupting chemical Bisphenol A (BPA) in thermal paper (e.g. till receipts) – but industry is now arguing that the alternatives are less well understood.

Since the French Government’s proposal for an EU wide ban on BPA in thermal paper, which CHEM Trust has supported, further research has been published showing how the BPA in thermal paper receipts can migrate into our bloodstream if the conditions are right.

In the meantime, parts of industry that specialise in BPA are, not surprisingly, gearing up to oppose this ban, as reported by Chemical Watch, disagreeing with the French Government’s claims regarding availability of alternatives to BPA. This is a pretty standard part of the debate on taking any chemical off the market, which usually involves the chemical industry questioning how much they know about the safety of the alternatives, even if they are already producing them in substantial quantities.

A second part of the industry’s argument is over the toxicity of BPA, which is a very contested issue (see our page on Bisphenol A for more on this & other news on BPA in our blog). In particular, all parties are waiting for the publication of an assessment by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA).

CHEM Trust has many concerns regarding this assessment, and we are quoted in the Chemical Watch story:

Efsa’s assessment is eagerly awaited by stakeholders, who shared mixed opinions on the authority’s research at a meeting, earlier this year. NGOs have since called on it to recommend measures to ensure protection against BPA effects on the mammary gland, says Gwynne Lyons, policy director at ChemTrust. “I feel that Efsa is focused on protecting industry rather than protecting the unborn child,” she says.  

Update

The EFSA assessment of BPA has been published, for more information see here.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Tagged With: Bisphenol A, BPA, EDC, Endocrine Disruptors, REACH, Thermal paper

Back to the homepage

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the CHEM Trust Newsletter

CHEM Trust Privacy Policy

Read our latest newsletter

Subscribe to the blog

Get an email when this blog is updated.

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Recent Tweets

My Tweets

Click for posts on…

AuthorisationBisphenol ABrexitBrominated flame retardantsChildrenCircular EconomyCSSDEHPDG SantéECHAEDC CriteriaEFSAEndocrine DisruptorsEUEU-USEU CommissionFCMFoodFood contactGreen EconomyGroupingHealthHuman healthMixturesPackagingPesticidesPFASPharmaceuticalsPhthalatesPlasticsPollutionREACHScience PolicyThermal paperTradeTTIPUKUK PolicyWaterWildlife

Copyright CHEM Trust · Reg Charity No. 1118182 · Disclaimer · Login