• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

CHEM Trust

Protecting humans and wildlife from harmful chemicals

  • Home
    • Our policy site
    • Advice for consumers
  • About us
    • About CHEM Trust
    • CHEM Trust Europe
    • Our team
    • Trustees of CT UK
    • Our funders
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Privacy Policy
  • Our work
    • Our work – UK, EU and global
    • Newsletters
    • Publications
    • Talks & comment
    • EU policy submissions
    • UK policy submissions
  • Problem chemicals
    • Hormone Disrupting Chemicals FAQ
    • Bisphenols
    • Phthalates
    • PFAS
    • Pharmaceutical pollution
    • Chemicals and plastics
  • Chemical impacts
    • Health impacts
    • Wildlife impacts
  • Chemicals policy
    • EU-REACH
    • UK policy
    • Chemicals and the Circular Economy
    • Food contact materials
    • Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
    • Chemical mixtures
    • Toxic-free toys
    • Universal PFAS Restriction
  • Take Action

CHEM Trust joins with other NGOs to highlight the importance of REACH to the Circular Economy

April 22, 2015 By Michael Warhurst

The debate on the ‘Circular Economy’ is hotting up, as the Juncker Commission tries to work out what changes it is going to make to the existing proposal to make it ‘more ambitious’. CHEM Trust have already pointed out the importance of chemical regulation – in particular REACH – in cleaning up the circular economy. We’ve now joined with European Environmental Bureau (EEB), Friends of the Earth Europe and Zerowaste Europe, to produce a short position paper on the issue, entitled “The Circular Economy and REACH: An Essential Partnership“.

You can find the full details of our shared position in the two page position paper, but here are the headlines:

  • A clean, effective and sustainable circular economy requires the removal of problematic substances from products at the design stage.
  • Once recycled material re-enters the economy due to it receiving end of waste status, by complying with specific end of waste criteria or being incorporated in a new product, it must be fully compliant with chemical legislation.
  • When a temporary exemption or authorisation has been granted to enable the continued presence of hazardous substances in products made from recycled material, the material should be labelled.
  • Research and development of processes to remove hazardous substances from waste materials should be encouraged.
  • Companies making products should be aware of the chemicals they are using, and which are likely to be restricted in the future, for example by using the SIN List.
  • The claims made regarding the economic impact of REACH on recyclers, particularly SMEs, are not backed by good quality data.

In conclusion, the EU should focus on creating a clean circular economy, as without this there is a major risk of a future loss in public and market confidence in recycled material.

Update

This joint position paper has been covered by Chemical Watch and by Food Packaging Forum.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Tagged With: Circular Economy, Green Economy, Packaging, Policy submissions, Pollution, REACH, Recycling

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Toxic-Free for EU

Subscribe to Toxic-Free for EU, a weekly briefing on EU politics and chemicals regulatory affairs.

Subscribe here

Subscribe to our blog

Get an email when we publish a new blog post

Follow us

  • Bluesky
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Bluesky

Copyright CHEM Trust · Reg Charity No. 1118182 · Disclaimer · Login

Want to keep up-to-date with our work?

Subscribe to the CHEM Trust newsletter.

Subscribe here