• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

CHEM Trust

Protecting humans and wildlife from harmful chemicals

  • Home
    • Our policy site
    • Advice for consumers
  • About us
    • About CHEM Trust
    • CHEM Trust Europe
    • Our team
    • Trustees of CT UK
    • Our funders
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Privacy Policy
  • Our work
    • Our work – UK, EU and global
    • Newsletters
    • Publications
    • Talks & comment
    • EU policy submissions
    • UK policy submissions
  • Problem chemicals
    • Hormone Disrupting Chemicals FAQ
    • Bisphenols
    • Phthalates
    • PFAS
    • Pharmaceutical pollution
    • Chemicals and plastics
  • Chemical impacts
    • Health impacts
    • Wildlife impacts
  • Chemicals policy
    • EU-REACH
    • UK policy
    • Chemicals and the Circular Economy
    • Food contact materials
    • Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
    • Chemical mixtures
    • Toxic-free toys
    • Universal PFAS Restriction
  • Take Action

Is the chemical industry trying to weaken rules on labelling harmful chemicals?

September 25, 2014 By Michael Warhurst

Chemical Watch has reported that the chemical-industry backed ECETOC organisation is pushing to change the way hazardous chemicals are classified & labelled.

The group aims to change the safety labels on chemical that are carcinogenic (cancer causing) or toxic to reproduction. These labels inform users of the chemicals about their hazards, so that risk management measures can be taken. ECETOC wants to move to a situation where the potency is considered when deciding what to put on the label.

CHEM Trust senior policy advisor Ninja Reineke explains why this is the wrong approach:

“This industry proposal is deeply worrisome,” said Ninja Reineke from the NGO ChemTrust.

“Chemical companies should be trying to design chemicals which don’t cause cancer or toxicity to reproduction, or avoid and limit their use. But instead, here they are suggesting to downgrade the classification of carcinogens and reproductive toxicants, which would open the door to the use of more harmful chemicals,” she says.

“Exposure to a weakly potent carcinogen might still result in some cancers, in particular, when exposure occurs at critical times and in combination with other carcinogens,” Ms Reineke adds.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Tagged With: CLP, CMR, EU Commission, Reproductive toxin

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Toxic-Free for EU

Subscribe to Toxic-Free for EU, a weekly briefing on EU politics and chemicals regulatory affairs.

Subscribe here

Subscribe to our blog

Get an email when we publish a new blog post

Follow us

  • Bluesky
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Bluesky

Copyright CHEM Trust · Reg Charity No. 1118182 · Disclaimer · Login

Want to keep up-to-date with our work?

Subscribe to the CHEM Trust newsletter.

Subscribe here